FLUORIDATION – ROGUES GALLERY
THE CONTINUED PROMOTION OF WATER FLUORIDATION
IN THE FACE OF MOUNTING ADVERSE EVIDENCE AND
SCIENTIFIC CRITICISM REQUIRES RE-EVALUATION
~ Last updated – 19th Sept. 2019 ~
WE WISH TO THANK OUR LOYAL SUPPORTERS WORLD WIDE
The pictures hanging in our ‘ROGUES GALLERY’ are of SOME
of those who promoted artificial water fluoridation in the
knowledge that it was an expensive dangerous fraud.
Some of these people did, or intended to do, other
great things, but failed to resist or intentionally
$upported The Nefarious Fluoridation Hoax.
WE HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY THEM
THEY ARE LEGALLY IN ERROR
OUR HALL OF SHAME:
The continued promotion of artificial water fluoridation in the
…face of mounting adverse evidence and criticism
…requires some re-evaluation:
“It seems that the proponents hit upon an idea years ago which appealed to them, and which they felt was sound. As their claims for safety are progressively discredited, rather than acknowledge this, they persist in condoning the original statement. At the same time they are still lending their prestige to such equivocation. Certainly the proponents of fluoridation are not intent upon poisoning or harming anyone, however, the dilemma of prestige is still a very difficult matter for them to resolve.”
The legal implications should have them worried and soon retreating in disarray.
…For the great enemy of truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic… JFK 1962
Fluoridation advocates are unable to defend their position in open public debate.
This is not due to a lack of debating skills on their part, but rather the fact that science simply does not support their claims that swallowing fluoride is safe for humans and pets, or that it reduces tooth decay.
Poisoning drinking water is a war crime.
According to an EPA report once you remove the fluorine from
Sarin, all that remains is a non-toxic acid. In other words,
the same fluorine that is in our drinking water
–is what gives sarin its deadly “kick”.
Dr. Dililp is still pushing the F. barrow [6th March 2019]
Extract from WHO:
© World Health Organization (WHO)
Full original text »⇒ HERE ⇐« Page 30 ~ 3.1.2
He is out of step with ethics, history,
the public, his party and science
While addressing the chamber on the “benefits of fluoridation” the
NSW chief medical officer Dr. Kerry Chant was heckled by the
gallery packed with anti-fluoride residents and protestors,
prompting the Mayor to interject and call for order.
“There are no harms proven,” Dr. Chant said
as the gallery shouted “not true, not true”.
You can fool some of the people only some of the time
See also »⇒ Sarin in Syria
~ Professor Anne Kelso ~
She has been reappointed as CEO of the Australian Government’s
leading health and medical research agency for a
further five years — until 2023.
That is going to be a hot seat for her as more new evidence
on fluoridation problems will weigh on her credibility.
Lying by omission is bad enough but her
recent comments on fluorides not being accumulative
and persistent, justifies our incomplete list of corrections below:
We wish to remind Anne that her first loyalty is to the
Hippocratic Oath— NOT to pharmaceutical companies.
Dear Professor Anne Kelso,
Your recent comment – March 2018 on the non-accumulation of fluorides in the bodies of humans (and animals) flies in the face of science for the last 50+ years and all the advanced nations of planet earth. The damage that fluorides do to humans, animals and plants is accumulative. See research by The Queensland Government on Fluorosis of Sheep drinking bore water. We think you should retract your statement on this mater as soon as possible, and search for better advisors in the future, and or consider resignation.
…..Respectfully Yours in Science,
The Internet has given us all access to global
science, as well as fake $cience.If the NHMRC is so uniformed on fluoridation
why should the public trust them on other matters?
The pro-fluoridation advocates are unable to defend
their position in open public debate. This is not through
a lack of debating skills on their part, but rather
the fact that science does not support their
claims that swallowing fluoride
is safe or that it dramatically
reduces tooth decay.
Dear Sarah Raphael, please note:
Science does NOT support the safety
of fluorides or mercury in dentistry.
Web sites such as ours will NOT go away
until water fluoridation is stopped.
We invite you to assist us.
⇓ On the 28th June 2018 ⇓
“The fight for fluoridation in Oberon continues.- ADA NSW Advocacy and Policy Advisor and Specialist Paediatric Dentist Dr. Sarah Raphael was interviewed on Channel Ten’s [Aust. TV] ‘The Project’ last night (5 June 2018) promoting the safety and effectiveness of water fluoridation for oral health and the prevalence of misinformation online. – Were you referring to us? Please pass on this site address to future audiences – we need more readers, – Do not malign us – Just quote us, and join us. – The truth will come out-
→ Fluoridation on trial – 21 May 2018
Largely unseen, a lawsuit that aims to outlaw public water
fluoridation is moving forward in the federal District Court – California.
»⇒ New ⇐«
George Orwell wrote that political language
is designed to make lies sound truthful.
This study was supported by the U.S. National Institutes of Health
The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences/the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
Some Dentists who will NOT be queueing
for a position in our “Rogues Gallery”
⇒ HERE ⇐
“Science has left the building”
Fluoridation: A Horror Story
↓ By Wade Frazier ↓
→ www.ahealedplanet.net/fluoride.htm ←
→ The University of Rochester ←
Rochester Uni. infamous for research at the time of
the Manhattan Project secretly injected people
with plutonium without their knowledge, –
using them as experimental guinea pigs.
It still promotes fluoridation –
which is experimental.
Much of the proof of fluoride’s alleged safety in low doses rests
on the postwar work done at the University of Rochester
in anticipation of lawsuits against the ‘A’
bomb program for human injury.
A CAREER OF CONCEALING THE TRUTH
The author of the 1944 CNS research proposal was
Harold C. Hodge, chief of fluoride toxicology studies for the
University of Rochester’s division of the Manhattan Project.
Much of the proof of fluoride’s alleged safety in low doses rests on the
postwar work done at the University of Rochester
in anticipation of lawsuits against the bomb
program for human injury.
Harold Carpenter Hodge – Fluoridation
” Engineering of Consent ”
He was an Austrian-American pioneer
in the field of public relations and propaganda,
named one of the 100 most influential Americans of the
20th century by Life magazine. He believed in a sort of
“enlightened despotism” ideology.
Bernays also pioneered the PR industry’s use of psychology
and other social sciences to design his public persuasion campaigns.
He played a key role in selling fluoride to New Yorkers in the 1960′s.
❝ If New Yorkers will accept fluoride, other cities will follow. ❞
See New York letters below at the time – 1963 ⇓
“The peasants are revolting“
It is [now] illegal in NY State to describe any pesticide as safe.
If you examine the actual texts of the Mayor’s safety claims
within his press releases you will find that each one is
qualified by terms like “relatively safe”, “less toxic than”
and “safe when used according to directions”.
FLUORIDATION and Edward Bernays
Expert for Hire – He lied under oath on fluoridation and cancer.
Sir Richard Doll, received millions of dollars in consulting fees
from chemical companies, asbestos companies, and other
industries which create carcinogenic materials.
Fluoride: Lies, Brown Envelopes, Subterfuge and Corruption
Among other retainers he received $1000 a day (rising to $1500 a day) for over thirty years from Monsanto. Yet in scientific publications, as an expert witness, and before
government authorities he often defended these chemicals against evidence they caused cancer. According to the UK based group injurywatch.co.uk in a sidebar entitled –
…………..“Sir Richard Doll: The Industry Man?”
They note: In 1976, in spite of well-documented concerns on the risks
of fluoridation of drinking water with industrial wastes,
Doll declared that it was “unethical” not to do so.”
Thus fluoride may have been the first suspected carcinogen that Doll protected.
He defended water fluoridation in $cientific papers, public statements,
and ⇒ court testimony. ⇔ SIR RICHARD DOLL: A Questionable Pillar Of the Cancer Establishment
Former president of the International Association
for Dental Research, University of Rochester
Rockefeller Dental Fellow 1930 / Dean Tufts University
School of Dental Medicine.
Director Eastman Dental Centre 1947-1970.
He is credited with demonstrating fluoride would prevent caries.
( To his credit he researched the use of adhesive plastics for restorative dentistry. )
HE PROMOTED FLUORIDATION TO NHMRC (Aust.)
He is therefore the main link between the US Nuclear Weapons Industry and the Fluoridation of Australia.
He was→ the architect of fluoridation in Australia ←
He argued that breast-fed children should be given
because they are ‘deprived’ of fluoride.
Sorry Prof. Wendell Evans, we are unimpressed.
Modern science is now a challenge to you,
and history will be very unkind to you:
The processing of phosphate fertilizer results in smoke stack emissions of silicofluorides and other contaminants, which are significant environmental pollutants? The US EPA and other governmental agencies require these pollutants to be “scrubbed” from the chimneys to protect the environment people, flora, fauna, farm animals and crops from damage. However, this unprocessed liquid scrubbing mixture, called hydrofluorosilicic acid, is sold to unsuspecting municipalities as a source of ‘fluoride’ to be added to otherwise clean safe drinking water. – Colgate Oral Care
Official Corruption (Queensland)
UNESCO – Legal Instruments –
Universal Declaration on Bioethics
and Human Rights – 19 October 2005
ARTICLE 6 – CONSENT:
1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice. 21… ❞
An affirmation by Jeannette Young 15 January 2013
Fluoride is essential for dental health” – according to the Chief Health Officer:
” Implementing fluoridisation in water is the most important way local governments can improve the dental health of their communities”, according to Queensland’s Chief Health Officer Dr Jeannette Young. The Department of Health has written to every local government in Queensland, offering to meet and discuss the health benefits of fluoridation. Several local governments have taken up the offer and Dr Young is hopeful others will follow. – HOWEVER:-
Recent changes to Queensland’s legislation means local governments now have the decision making power to determine if it is in the best interests of their communities to implement, continue or cease water fluoridation. Dr Young said World Health Organisation studies showed adding fluoride to water supplies was a “Safe and Effective” way of reducing tooth decay. She said fluoride was not harmful to people’s health, despite the widespread scaremongering on the issue. “In the small amounts that are used in water supplies, fluoride is not harmful,” Dr Young said. “There is no evidence to show fluoride, in the amounts used in water supplies, has any detrimental health effects. “In fact, studies have shown that people with good dental health have better overall health. “Townsville has been using fluoride in its water supplies since 1964 and it has not resulted in any health problems there. “There is no reliable evidence of any adverse health effects to communities which have already implemented fluoride in their water supplies.” Queensland’s Chief Dental Officer Dr Rhys Thomas said fluoride was proven to strengthen teeth and prevent tooth decay. “Ultimately it is up to local authorities to implement and continue fluoridation. But we hope that they are making decisions armed with all the facts,” Dr Thomas said. “Studies have shown that the use of fluoride benefits everyone regardless of their age or access to dental care. “Australian Child Dental Health surveys consistently show that Queensland children have levels of tooth decay well above the national average. https://twitter.com/qldhealthnews or https://www.facebook.com/QLDHealth “ The use of fluoride is one way of turning this around.”
Dr Jeannette Young, recently stated words to the effect:
.….. In medicine not many things are black and white but
…….water fluoridation is one of those things“.
Yes we agree – it is BLACK … [or “Blue” ]
CRIMINAL CODE 1899 – SECT 92 »⇒ Abuse of Office
He has enough letters after his name to make a good serve of
alphabet soup, however his constant defence of fluoridation
casts a shadow over his knowledge and $incerity.
Just following orders didn’t work as a defense for the Nazis
and it shouldn’t work for those who poison our water either!
~ Jennifer Doggett ~
– We agree – No more debate is required!
See – Dr. Michael Foley
Dr. Rachael Dunlop is the President
of the Australian Skeptics Inc. and by association
supports water fluoridation – not good for her image.
Because ‘The Australian Skeptics’ are so ill-informed about
fluoridation, can we have confidence in them on other maters?
We think the time has come for the ‘Australian Skeptics’
to be skeptical about fluoridation!
“…The number of complaints against dental
dental practitioners is increasing…”
Your policy on fluoridation may
have something to do with this!
~ Dr. Ken Perrott PhD.- He seems very unhappy about Fluorosis ! ~
Dr. Karl Kruszelnicki
His support for fluoridation is surprising.
We expected much better from him.
Have we found a gap in his logic?
Dr Carrie Tsai is a Lecturer at the Faculty of Dentistry.
Her public health image is sabotaged
by her support of fluoridation.
Is she just repeating policy?
Dr Steven Donohue, Dr Michael Foley and Public Health
physician Dr Greg Jackson, – These pro-fluoride speakers said
fluoride was not a medication or a waste product and that
fluoridation was simply about topping up the natural
levels of fluoride in water, for optimum dental health!
We have no confidence in the impartiality of the institutions
of government or the professions which have endorsed
fluoridation for decades. Those who have built their
careers and professional status on fluoridation
cannot credibly assess the evidence against it.
Michael Foley: … Try to avoid debates in public or on the radio or TV in which anti-fluoridationists also appear. Disproving anti-fluoridationists claims takes considerably longer than making claims in the first place, and some degree of doubt from the original claim will often still be left. Simply holding a debate reinforces the perception that both sides have equally valid viewpoints. – Don’t give them that respectability… “
‘Fluoride the ‘God of Dentists’, the saviour of teeth.
Not to believe in fluoridation is to be forever damned.
Dr. Foley is the local disciple who tries to bullies us!
Michael Foley: … The science is very much on one side of the argument.
There are no reputable health authorities anywhere in the world that oppose water fluoridation. There are certainly individuals and sometimes smart individuals and there are certainly single issue groups, but the health groups around the world and the science groups around the world are strongly on the side of fluoridation…” – ABC TV 7.30 – 27 Feb. 2013.
………… See → LEGAL WINS AND ARGUMENTS.
Mercury is know to be a associated with madness!
… Mercury levels in blood of dental professionals ranged from 0.6 to 57 ug/L …
More on Hypothyroidism and Fluorides
As a Member, Dr. Foley may need to re-read
The Code of Ethics – IADR
See »⇒ Abuse of Office
“Safe & Effective”
Dr. Greg Jackson Water Quality Expert !
He is responsible for Queensland Health’s policy and programs for drinking water, recycled water and recreational water. He manages the implementation of water fluoridation, sets state-wide water quality standards for drinking water, recycled water and CSG [Coal Seam Gas] water, and manages compliance with the Water Fluoridation Act – this includes ‘Legionella Control’. We trust that he is aware that fluoridated water hastens corrosion under which legionella breeds, and that city water should be kept clean using chlorine dioxide which WILL kill biofilm, unlike chlorine which will NOT.
Dr Birch said the ADAQ wanted all water in Queensland
fluoridated as the health benefits were
well researched and studied.♦
We agree, – very well researched…
FDA’s definition of – “Safe & Effective”
♦ [ Population 4.8 Million]
Why do you wish to make so many enemies?
James Forrestal US Defense Secretary anti-fluoridation
30 Aust. Defence Bases Contaminated With Fluoride Chemical (PFOA)
We hope to see you on This Post one day.
Regenerative endodontics is dentistry of the future.
Happiness is when what you think, what you say,
and what you do are in harmony – Mahatma Gandhi
[They all seem to be queuing up to get on our Rogues Gallery?]
“ My goal is to represent and serve the members of our association
and continue building a strong membership and financial base
that provides us with a powerful lobbying platform.”
Your push for fluoridation seems to be more
of a priority than the health of the State!
Six extracts from PubMed on F.
STATISTICAL BIAS +one
Corporate DishonestyHowever full text → HERE
Fluoride Free Dentists ↔ More ↔ More
The ADA have been repeating triceratillion times the same
old fossilised message for 50 + years:
“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.”
Yeppoon (Qld.) dentist John Christensen believes a decision to remove
fluoride from Rockhampton region’s water supply would defy all logic. *
→ A previous resident disagreed… ←
Fluoridation is a policy not a science.
With possible legal implications as per recent declaration by
insurance companies for promoters such as your self.
* Rockhampton is the State’s 24th council to get rid of fluoridation.
“National Health & Medical Research Council
have skilfully assembled this report to reach
their intended rasorial conclusions.”
Emeritus Professor Judith Whitworth,
Ms Debra Petrys, Professor Sharon Goldfeld,
Professor Vicki Anderson, Professor Dallas English,
Professor Mathew Gillespie, Professor Alison Jones,
Emeritus Professor A. John Spencer, Professor Clive Wright,
Associate Professor Frederic Leusch, Professor Wendy Rogers,
Doctor Meenakshi Arora, Associate Professor Stephen Corbett,
Professor Mike Morgan, Adjunct Professor Kaye Roberts-Thomson.
“…There is no reliable evidence that water fluoridation at current
Australian levels causes health problems…”
See ⇒ Abuse of Office
Fluoridation – Eminence based rather than evidence based.
We hope to see you all »⇒ HERE
Premier of Queensland – 28 July 2005 – 13 Sept. 2007
Forced Fluoridation On Four Million Queenslanders
See copies of letters sent to her from us: »⇒ HERE ⇐«
ADA / Qld. Labour Party Collusion:
The Queensland Health Department, under Anna Bligh
funded The Australian Dental Association Queensland Branch,
$220,000 as a CONtribution to its pro-fluoridation campaign.
The request for this funding was directed to the
Hon. Stephen Robertson MP. The Minister
for Health at the time, Feb. 2006.
»⇒ FOI_qld_ADA grant ⇐«
Dr. M. Brown (Chief Dental Officer, Dept. of Health, Queensland),
fluoridation resulted in reduced tooth decay, with Townsville
children having the lowest prevalence of dental rot among all four
regions. ❝ Unfortunately well-meaning, but ill-informed, people
are the ones who sometimes drive the agenda rather
than listening to evidence and experts. ❞
Fluoride Intake Increasing Bone Fractures
~ Previous Australian Federal Health Minister — Tanya Plibersek. ~
You made it to this gallery not because you were the Minister for Health,
but because of your pro- fluoride outburst on ‘Q & A’ (TV) 18 Feb. 2013
(A departure from the calm poise and patience you are noted for.)
Tania please have a chat to one of your predecessors ⇓ ⇓
Former Federal Health Minister
Founding Director of ARCPOH – Another slow learner !
A new direction is required, — or may be, a new Director !
May be too close to ‘Colgate’ – Compromised $cience!
Trying to defend the indefensible.
See more info on Jason Armfield »⇒ HERE
»⇒ Writes numerous trivial promotional out of date reports on fluoridation.
RE-EXAMINATION OF ACUTE TOXICITY OF FLUORIDE
by Kenji Akiniwa, Tokyo, Japan ⇑
Dr. $tephen Barrett
‘Quack Watch’ B – Also paid by companies to lie.
“Repetition does not transform a lie into a truth.”
Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882 – 1945),
‘Quack Watch’ C – Also Paid by companies to lie.
“Truth is the only safe ground to stand on”.
Elizabeth Cady Stanton (1815 – 1902)
He believes his biggest achievement on council, was the
introduction of fluoride into Yass, NSW water supply – June 1956.
❝ It was not easy persuading some of the locals of the public health benefits
of fluoride. In fact, the dental professional says it was a real battle,
and one where even after the vote to add fluoride to the water
had been won, there was a real chance of a rescission
if the balance of power on the Council shifted. ❞
»⇒ ‘DEATH CERTIFICATE AND LETTERS’ ⇐«
Gynaecologist – Dr. William McBride was exposed for fraudulent
research. In 1979 McBride carried the fluoridation torch
for the NSW Health Dept., the AMA, ADA and
the Sydney University Dental Health
Education & Research Foundation.
Letter from Doctors
We are not amused
“ Some cause happiness wherever they go;
others, whenever they go.” – Oscar Wilde
Yet another drug pusher – F.
“It is one thing to use fluorides on the enemy in times of war, ♦
but it is quite another to use it on your own population
after the war is over in the form of fluoridation.
Is that what our soldiers went to war and died for?”
– Glen S. R. Walker, F.I.M.F., E.M.E.C.S., M.A.E.S., –
♦ SARIN = Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl-Fluoride (nerve gas)
Sarin is also known as GB.
SOMAN = Picacolyl-Methyl-Phosphonos-Fluoride
⇓ A recent Submission by Dr. Geoff Pain ⇓
WA Standing Committee on Fluoridation – Kununuarra – by Geoff Pain
He said ‘The Health Australia Party‘s opposition to
fluoride in the water supply was flawed.
⇑ listen ⇑
This sound track available AGAIN!
Dr. Hambleton is talking to John Laws about fluoridation…
He says: Fluoride is safe and has not been shown to cause
any of the health concerns that people try to ascribe to it.
If the AMA can not get this right, it is no surprise that the public is losing confidence and respect in this once prestigious organization …
See extract from an e-letter below sent to us from one of our readers after hearing Dr. Hambleton talking to John Laws:
❝ … I was recently forwarded an audio file of a radio interview you did with John Laws in July,  and I am shocked by the misleading, inaccurate and downright untrue statements you made in that interview on the subject of water fluoridation…”
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS (HANSARD)
Page 740 of Qld. – ‘Water Fluoridation Bill’– 12 Mar 2008:
“…As a dentist by profession, I want to make this point:
fluoride is not a poison or pesticide. Fluoride is
not a form of mass medication or chemical terrorism.
There is no credible scientific evidence to suggest that
fluoride has any adverse effect on health…”
[ Well it is a relief to have that confirmed,
and to have it all recorded in Hansard! ]
Principal Advisor, Ministry of Health;
Senior Lecturer, University of Sydney
Extract from her writings:
❝…However, public support for water fluoridation decreases during campaigns involving plebiscites/referendums because of the myriad of tactics and propaganda used by anti-fluoridationists’, which run the gamut of conspiracy theories to scare mongering. One such tactic is to call upon “experts”, some of whom might even have legitimate scientific or academic credentials, to lend credence to their claims, as was in this case. As a result, voters would often choose the safer option of not fluoridating because of the difficulty in sorting fact from fiction or to judge which “authorities” to believe…❞
“We have known for many years that the leaders of the ADA and other pro-fluoridation organizations have told their members not to debate us. They claim that the reason for this is the fear that it will give us credibility. The real reason, of course, is that they don’t have the science on their side. Thus the fact that they have now agreed to debate several times over the last few years is suggestive that they sense they are losing ground, especially on the internet. But their gamble of taking us on in public is not working.
We are winning those debates and in some cases quite easily. ..” Paul Connett, PhD
“Ridicule is not a part of the scientific method and the
public should not be taught that it is.” – Dr. A. Hynek
He said all water had some naturally occurring fluoride in it,
but most had less than what was regarded as optimal for health.
One of these sub-groups consists of people with impaired kidney
function,including subjects with nephropathic diabetes.
Chief Executive Officer,
Extract From: Submission
From The Public Health Association of Australia On
– The Transparency Of The TGA –
❝… All complaints about the promotion of therapeutic goods referred to
the TGA by [The] Complaint Resolution Committee (CRP), of the
Complementary Health Care Council, or handled direct
should be made publicly available as should the
action taken, the time line and the outcome.
The TGA’s ‘new’ policy on complaint
investigations only concerns
publishing the outcome of
into complaints about advertising
which have been referred by the CRP. …
❝ The PHAA believes that ALL complaints referred to the
TGA should be dealt with expeditiously and transparently.
Alternatively, the CRP should handle all complaints and be
given the power to enforce sanctions… ❞
Well said sir, we can only hope that all complaints about
fluoridation receive your PROMPT attention in the near future.
This web site and many others can provide you with all the
science to show that fluoridation is not “complementary”
to human, animal or plant health— therefore
please consider this web site as a
complaint, and have it dealt
“…The evil that men do lives after them;
And the fluoride is oft interred with our bones…”
with apologies to:
William Shakespeare ↔ Julius Caesar ↔ Act 3. Scene II
Dr. Karin Alexander was a previous Federal President of the Australian Dental Association. She spoke on Brisbane Radio 4BC (Feb. 2013) She attempted to put a good spin on fluoridation – no science quoted, but some nonsense e.g. Fluoride is only a mineral supplement -it occurs naturally, and breaks down naturally. [?] And dismissed the interviewer’s concerns about medicating the community without their permission.
“ The ADA continues to be dismayed with the scare mongering from fringe groups…“
The ADA have been repeating triceratillion times
the same old fossilised message for 50 + years:
“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.”
And more recently:
❝ The ADA continues to be dismayed with the scaremongering
from fringe groups, [see list of nobel prize winners],
that lack consideration of the scientific evidence
of the significant benefits for dental health
that occurs from the fluoridation
of water supplies.❞
Meet a member of the ‘Fringe Group’ ↓
Judge John P. Flaherty
Read more: ↓
So much cleverness, $kill and $cience, contaminated by commerce.
Far too many candidates for our ‘Fluoride Rogues’ Gallery’.
IS FLUORIDATION A CRIME ?
One who knowingly, voluntarily, and with common intent unites with the principal offender in the commission of a crime. One who is in some way concerned or associated in commission of crime; partaker of guilt; one who aids or assists, or is an Accessory. One who is guilty of complicity in crime charged, either by being present and aiding or abetting in it, or having advised and encouraged it, though absent from place when it was committed, though mere presence, Acquiescence, or silence, in the absence of a duty to act, is not enough, no matter how reprehensible it may be, to constitute one an accomplice. One is liable as an accomplice to the crime of another if he or she gave assistance or encouragement or failed to perform a legal duty to prevent it with the intent thereby to promote or facilitate commission of the crime.
Just following orders didn’t work as a defence for the Nazis and
……………….. it shouldn’t work for those who poison our water supply either!
⇓ 21 April 2017 update ⇓
“This Public Health Service, unfortunately,
has locked itself into a position where it
has made this statement on the record
that there is absolutely no hazard to
fluoridating public water supplies
and the matter is closed.
Now, that, of course, is immediately
a unscientific approach.”
Ralph Nader, Consumer Advocate, 1971
Fluoridation is his toxic religion –
that is why he is in this ‘Rogues Gallery’!
The Fluoride Action Network paid to have a
professional translation of the Court’s ruling
High Court Case Number 8173/12
»⇒ see it here. ⇐«