FLUORIDATION – Professionals who are skeptical.
Sir Edward Dunlop stood on the platform of the Melbourne
Town Hall, June 1975 & delivered a paper against fluoridation.
He is also a member of the World Health Organisation’s
Expert Advisory Panel on Drug Policies & Management
FLUORIDES, THE DEADLY TOXIN WITHIN
❝ Putting this stuff into drinking water,
is essentially a hazardous waste management tool.
It has nothing to do with dental health, whatsoever. ❞
Dr. William Hirzy → Source
Dr. George L. Waldbott – Fluoride Allergies
physician, scientist, and a leading activist against fluoridation.
Dr. R.V.S.N. Sarma
FLUOROSIS – INDIA
An Australian surgeon who was renowned for his leadership while being held prisoner by the Japanese during World War II Sir Edward was held in great scientific and medical esteem, in Australia, and throughout the world.
Sir Edward stood on the platform of the Melbourne Town Hall, June 1975 and delivered a paper against fluoridation. A few quotes from his speech, and his constant support the anti-fluoridation movement prompt us all to once again pay homage to this great gentleman. He stated:
… Some early enthusiasm arising from the dental beliefs has been replaced by doubts in many countries. Objection to fluoridation on scientific grounds has been based on various points. The one about which I am most personally informed is the incidence of toxic fluorosis, especially in the skeleton. Crippling deformities of the skeleton due to fluoride toxicity such as ‘forward bending’. ‘stiffness of the spine’, ‘reduced mobility of the chest’, and ‘sprouts on the bone; have been reported from different parts of the world…
Brisbane Mayor Atkinson April 1985 she proposed to fluoridate
Brisbane city, but changed her mind after receiving numerous
letters from citizens and technical literature – see below ⇓
FLUORIDATION 1979 by Philip Sutton
(Provided by Brisbane Anti-Fluoridation Association)
❝ We are all affected by this potentially dangerous fraud: The convincing of Governments and people generally that it is ethical, safe and beneficial to medicate, compulsorily, many millions of people throughout their lives with small but uncontrollable doses of a cumulative and very toxic substance because of the notion that it reduces the prevalence of dental decay. All this, although neither its safety nor any scientifically-proved reduction in the number of decayed teeth has been demonstrated. ❞
Read the complete book here→ F. 1979 Sutton
See also → The Greatest Fraud – Fluoridation
See also → Fluoridation Omission And Errors
See also → Fluoridation Canberra 1963 – Killen
(EXTRACT FROM HANSARD)
Less-reported were a series of parallel scientific studies
warning that fluoridation would increase the
absorption of this deadly radioactive isotope.
It would seem that it is easier to stop nuclear testing in USA than to stop fluoridation!