See ⇒ HERE & HERE
[.Brave comments from the authorities on how to
poison our drinking water and make it a convincing,
and a legal requirement for others to execute.]
Fluoridation is Mass Medication,
New Zealand Supreme Court Rules
” State And Territory Governments Continue
To Promote Fluoridated Drinking Water In Australia “
[ The TGA is funded by pharmaceutical companies! ]
15 July 2019
Full Original Text ⇒ HERE
The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA*) has clarified that state and territory governments will continue to be responsible for regulating fluoride in reticulated drinking water (‘tap water’) **.
Legislative amendments made on 11th July 2019 put an end to any uncertainties about regulatory responsibility by explicitly excluding fluoridated drinking water from the scope of Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Legislation. ***
In Australia, the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 sets out the legal requirements for supplying therapeutic goods, such as medicines and medical devices. Following an amendment to the Therapeutic Goods (Excluded Goods) Determination 2018, fluoridated water is now an ‘excluded good’ for the purposes of The Act. The exclusion applies for any reticulated drinking water that contains fluoride, regardless of the original source of the fluoride. ****
The Australian Code For The Responsible Conduct Of Research, (2018), was jointly issued by the National Health And Medical Research Council, The Australian Research Council and Universities Australia. – We presume they were all compliant and therefor are in breach of this their own regulation!
Adjusting the level of fluoride in drinking water is a safe and effective way of preventing tooth decay in the community. In Australia, state and territory water authorities adjust the amount of fluoride in community water supplies using strict controls, which are set out by regulations in each jurisdiction. The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) has also stated ‘there is no reliable evidence of an association between community water fluoridation at current Australian levels and any health problems.’ Thus there is little risk that fluoridated reticulated drinking water would cause harm to the public if it were not regulated by the TGA.
State and territory governments established regulations for drinking water fluoridation as early as 1957, all before the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 came into force. State and territory regulations are appropriate, so there is no need to apply a national system of control. There is no indication in the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 that it was intended to apply to fluoridated drinking water. By specifically excluding fluoridated drinking water from the scope of The Act, ambiguity has been removed. For more information about fluoridation of drinking water in your area, contact your state or territory health department.
By excluding fluoride you do not have to regulate it.
It is currently added to much of our water supply.
We conclude that the TGA and the NHMRC
do not want the legal responsibility of
fluoridation which is medicine, and
have ‘farmed’ out this problem to
the States and Local Councils
who are bullied by a few
* The TGA is mostly funded by pharmaceutical companies.
** No government body wants the responsibility for fluoridation.
*** Ending fluoridation will be the only end that we will accept.
**** It is not legal to deliberately contaminate drinking water with a poison.
Ten eighty, – Ten eighty one, – Novichok – & – Sarin
are all fluoride based poisons.!
Fluorides are accumulative poisons – No documents, professors,
law courts, can change physics, on this planet or any other.
The above statement “there is little risk that fluoridated
reticulated drinking water would cause harm to
the public” is a sop to history, a hoax, a
ruse and insult to true science.
National Drugs and Poisons Schedule Committee
Federal Register Of Legislative Instruments